SAO wins NOVA award

The SAO team is delighted to announce that our unit Galaxies and their Place in the Universe won a 2014 NOVA Awards for Online Learning Excellence sponsored by Open Universities Australia.

Interacting

Snapshot of SAO’s 3D PDF of two interacting disk galaxies. (Credit: SAO and Daisuke Kawata)

The unit design principles of Open Universities Australia for which the NOVA is awarded are centred on authentic, adaptive, personalised, collaborative and supported learning. Our SAO unit Galaxies and their Place in the Universe provides an interactive, authentic and supportive learning environment via (i) the innovative use of online interactions & collaboration, (ii) assessment in an authentic context, (iii) appropriate & comprehensive learner support, and (iv) the use of technology for sound education outcomes.

As well as providing real-world hands-on activities which allow students to explore and discover the universe for themselves, Galaxies and their Place in the Universe is one of three introductory SAO units that contains interactive 3D PDFs.  The 3D PDFs, created using the Swinburne-designed S2PLOT package by David Barnes, Christopher Fluke and collaborators, allow students to interact with and explore complex 3D geometries and astronomical datasets.  An example of one of our 3D PDFs of interacting galaxies can be found below.

The NOVA awards were announced at the 2014 Education Frontiers Summit in Melbourne last week.  The SAO team submission was authored by Glen Mackie, Sarah Maddison, Chris Fluke and Artem Bourov. 

For more information, see

[Glen Mackie & Sarah Maddison]

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Double trouble: the birth of the magnetar

Magnetars are bizarre and exotic stellar remnants formed by the gravitational collapse of massive stars that are tens of times more massive than our Sun. The strongest magnets in the Universe, these objects are a rare variant of the neutron star, which are the relics of supernova explosions.

Artist’s impression of a magnetar in a rich, young star cluster. The lines represent the very strong magnetic field of the magnetar. (Credit: ESO/L. Calçada)

Depending on its initial mass, a star will end its live as one of three types of stellar remnants. White dwarfs are the remnants of low to intermediate mass stars (less than about 8 times the mass of our Sun) that eject their outer envelopes towards the end of their lives, leaving behind the exposed core of the initial star.  More massive stars have more violet deaths, ending their lives in a supernova explosion. Stars between about 8 and 40 solar masses will leave a neutron star behind after the supernova event, while even more massive stars will produce black holes as their stellar remnants.  The initial stellar mass that separates neutron stars and black holes is not very well constrained.

Like “normal” neutron stars, magnetars are tiny (about 20 km in diameter) and extraordinarily dense, with a teaspoon of magnetar material weighing around a billion tonnes. What sets magnetars apart from other pulsars is their incredibly high magnetic fields, which are of order 1015 G (which is 100 to 1,000 times stronger than radio pulsars). They rotation every few seconds, but it is thought that they must be born with rotation rates of 100 to 1,000 times per second to achieve such strong magnetic fields.

Exactly how magnetars form is unclear.  Simon Clark from the Open University and collaborators determined that one of the Milky Way’s 21 known magnetars must have formed from a star that was initially at least 40 times the mass of the Sun. The magnetar CXOU J164710.2-455216 (aka J1647-45) resides in the stellar cluster Westerlund 1, which is the closest ‘super star cluster’ to us. At a distance of 16,000 light years, Westerlund 1 contains hundreds of massive stars that are at least 30-40 times the mass of our Sun.

The problem, however, is that stars initially 40 times the mass of the Sun or more should end their lives as a black hole rather than a neutron star. Clark and collaborators have recently identified a small, bright, carbon-rich star that is hurtling away from J1647-45. They suggests that this ‘runaway star’, discovered with the Very Large Telescope in Chile’s Atacama Desert, was once locked in a binary system (two gravitationally bound stars closely orbiting each other) with the stellar progenitor of the magnetar. When the supernovae occurred there was sufficient force in the explosion to kick the companion star, Westerlund 1-5, out across the Westerlund 1 cluster.

The European Southern Observatory’s Very Large Telescope (VLT) in Chile. The world’s most advanced optical instrument, consisting of four Unit Telescopes with main mirrors of 8.2m diameter and four movable 1.8m diameter Auxiliary Telescopes. (Credit: ESO/S. Brunier)

This finding allows astronomers to recreate the evolutionary path taken by the binary system that allowed it to form a magnetar in place of a black hole. In the scenario proposed, the larger of the two stars (Westerlund 1-5) begins to shed its outer envelope, transferring some of its mass to the smaller companion star – fated to form the magnetar (J1647-45). As a result the progenitor of J1647-45 rotates faster and faster as it accrete gas shed by Westerlund 1-5, which amplifies its magnetic field to colossal strengths. Once a critical mass is reached, the progenitor of J1647-45 ejects its outer layers, a portion of which is transferred back to Westerlund 1-5. This volatile swapping of material provides the unique mix and enrichment of elements seen in the runaway star Westerlund 1-5. Crucially, it also reduces mass of the progenitor of J1647-45, slimming the star down sufficiently to produce a magnetar instead of a black hole at the moment of its death following the supernova explosion.

The unique combination of properties of the runaway star – it high velocity (expected from a star ejected by a supernova explosion), low mass, high luminosity and carbon-rich composition – is almost impossible to understand in a single star. These properties all support the idea that the runaway star must have originally been part of a binary system.

The new results suggest that being part of a binary star system may be an essential ingredient in forming at least some magnetars. The mass transfer between the stars produces that rapid rotation rate that is needed to produce the strong magnetic field of the magnetar, and the subsequent mass loss allows the progenitor to be in the right mass range to collapse into a magnetar rather than a black hole

For more information, see

[Toby Brown & Sarah Maddison]

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Coldest brown dwarf ever discovered just around the corner

Astronomers are constantly pushing our knowledge of galaxies farther toward the edge of the visible Universe, and yet we tend to forget that our local neighbourhood has not yet been fully mapped.  Just last month astronomers discovered the sixth-closest system to us, the brown dwarf WISE J085510.83-071442.5, which is also the record holder for the coolest star around.

Brown dwarfs are sub-stellar objects with masses between those of stars and planets (roughly between 10 and 80 times the mass of Jupiter). Like stars, brown dwarfs are thought to form from the collapse of molecular clouds, but their low mass prevents them from igniting nuclear reactions in their cores and shining brightly like our own Sun. Because they are much cooler than stars, the atmospheres of brown dwarfs contain  complex molecules like methane, which is seen in the giant gas planets of our Solar System. This makes brown dwarfs unique tools to investigate both the low-mass end of star formation and the chemistry of planetary atmospheres.

At the time of their formation, brown dwarfs have a typical surface temperature around 1,000 K and will cool down as they get older.  This means that they cannot be seen at optical wavelengths and infrared telescopes are needed to detect brown dwarfs.  In the last few years, the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) has nearly doubled the number of known brown dwarfs within 30 light-years from the Sun. By surveying the entire sky several times, WISE has not only been able to detect a large number of brown dwarfs, but also measure their proper motion (which is their angular velocity as they are seen to move across they sky). By following the motion of brown dwarfs over several years, astronomers can then determine their distance from the Earth using parallax.

WISE J085510.83-071442.5 is the latest brown dwarf discovered by WISE. Not only is it the closest brown dwarf to us at a distance of just 7.2 light years (compared to the closest star system alpha Centauri at a distance of about 4 light-years), but it’s also the coldest with a temperature of about 240 K, or about -30 C.

Kevin Luhman of Pennsylvania State University’s Center for Exoplanets and Habitable Worlds noticed that WISE J085510.83-071442.5 was moving pretty fast when comparing images from WISE that were six months apart.  The fast motion compared to the other stars in the images suggested that the object was very close to the Earth.  Luhman analysed images from the Spitzer Space Telescope and the Gemini North telescope in Hawaii to further track the motion of WISE J085510.83-071442.5, as well as help determine its temperature.  Combined the detections from WISE and Spitzer, taken from different positions around the Sun, enabled the measurement of its distance through parallax.

The coldest and closest brown dwarf yet known, WISE J085510.83-071442.5 was discovered through its rapid motion across the sky. It was first noticed in two infrared images taken six months apart in 2010 by NASA’s Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer, or WISE (orange triangles). Two additional images taken with NASA’s Spitzer Space Telescope in 2013 and 2014 (green triangles) show its continued motion across the sky. The four images were used to measure a distance of 7.2 light-years using the parallax effect. (Credit: ASA/JPL-Caltech/Penn State)

Its incredibly low temperature implies that WISE J085510.83-071442.5 is very old, as it would take several billion years for a brown dwarf to cool from a thousand degrees to its current chilly temperature. The estimated mass is extremely low, between 3-10 Jupiter masses.  This makes WISE J085510.83-071442.5  the closest, coldest, oldest and lowest mass sub-stellar objects detected to date!  Such a low mass puts it in the mass range of giant planets, which opens the intriguing possibility that WISE J085510.83-071442.5 may not be a brown dwarf, but might in fact be a giant planet that originally formed around a star and was later ejected by gravitational interactions with other planets in the system. Unfortunately, there is no way to directly test this scenario and Luhman excluded the hypothesis on a statistical basis, given that there brown dwarfs are expected to be common while the frequency of ejected planets is unknown.

Whatever the real nature of WISE J085510.83-071442.5, this exciting discovery shows that, even after many decades of studying the sky, our local neighbourhood is still full of surprises.

For more information, see

[Luca Cortese and Sarah Maddison]

 

 

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

First exoplanet day determined

Astronomers have determined the length of a day on an exoplanet for the first time. While over 1000 exoplanets have been discovered and characterised, none have yet had their rotation rates measured.

Most exoplanets that we know of have been detected in an indirect way, by measuring the effects the unseen planet has on the star it orbits.  Exoplanet are discovered by either measuring the  “wobble” of the star due to the gravitational perturbations of the planet, or by measuring the dimming of light as the unseen planet passes in front of the bright star and blocks some of the light. However, some exoplanets, like  β Pictoris b, have been directly detected, meaning astronomers observe the light coming from the planet itself.  It is easiest to directly detect young, massive planets that are not too close to their host star.  The further the planet is from its host star, the easier it is to distinguish the light from the planet (which is extremely faint compared to the bright star). Young planets still contain a large amount of heat left over from their formation, which makes them relatively big and puffed up.  The more massive a young planet is, the warmer and hence brighter it will be, making it easier to detect at infrared wavelengths.

Three infrared observations over 7 years of the exoplanet β Pic b. The light from the central star is blocked out, but the stellar location marked. The planet has moved to the other side of the star from 2003 to 2009, and its motion is clearly seen from October 2009 to March 2010. (Credit: Bonnefoy et al. 2011, Astronomy & Astrophysics)

While these images clearly show the motion of the planet, they cannot tell us the direction of the planet’s motion.  Using near-infrared high-dispersion spectroscopy with the help of the CRIRES instrument on the Very large Telescope in Chile, Ignas Snellen and collaborators have determined the orbital and rotational velocity of the planet orbiting  β Pic. The CRIRES  spectrograph uses a diffraction grating to break the infrared light up into its component wavelengths so that astronomers can target specific spectral lines. Snellen’s team targeted molecules produced in the cool atmospheres of giant planets (which include water, carbon monoxide, methane and ammonia). The spectral lines from these molecules, which are found in the near-infrared part of the electromagnetic spectrum, are quite distinct from the relatively smooth spectrum of the star. The atmosphere of the star is much hotter than that of the planet – especially for a large, hot A-type star like  β Pic – and it contains only a few atomic spectral lines rather than molecular lines.

The spectrum of the planet is shifted in wavelength by an amount that depends on the orbital speed and inclination of the planet’s orbit, and the spectral line will also be broadened by an amount the depends on the rotation speed of the planet. As the planet rotate, half of the planet appears to be moving toward us, which shifts the spectral lines towards to blue, while the other half of the planet appears to be moving away from us, shifting the spectral lines towards to red. These two effects combine and make the spectral lines both broader and shallower.  Snellen et al. found that the CO spectral lines of the planet was broad and blueshifted. By studying the position and shape of the spectral lines and comparing them to model spectra with different planetary rotation rates and spin axis inclinations (planetary “obliquity”), they calculated that the rotation rate must be at least 25 km/s.  The diameter of β Pic b is thought to be about 1.6 times that of Jupiter, which implies that a day on β Pic b lasts for 8 hours. The blueshifted spectra indicates that the planet is currently on a part of its orbit that is moving towards the Earth.

Spectral signal of β Pic b, which is rotationally broadened by 25 km/s, and also blueshifted with respect to the velocity of the host star, indicating that the planet is currently moving towards the Earth on its orbit.  (Credit: Snellen et al. 2014, Nature, 509, 63)

Spectral signal of β Pic b, which is rotationally broadened by 25 km/s, and also blueshifted with respect to the velocity of the host star, indicating that the planet is currently moving towards the Earth on its orbit. (Credit: Snellen et al. 2014, Nature, 509, 63)

The equatorial rotation rate of 25 km/s of β Pic b fits in quite well with the “mass-spin relation” we see for the planets of our Solar System, where the rotation rate increases with planetary mass.  The exact origin of this relation is not clear, but is likely due to planet formation. While the rocky terrestrials and gas giant planets follow different formation paths, all planets grow by the accretion of impacting bodies which add their angular momentum, or spin, to the growing planet. The larger the planet, the more impacting bodies it will have accreted and this could explain why more massive planets have faster spin rates. Given that β Pic b is still a young and hot planet, as it slowly cools it will contract, which will speed up its rotation rate (due to conservation of angular momentum). Over the next few hundred million years, the length of a day on β Pic b is expected to shorten to about 3 hours.

Rotation rate versus mass for the planets in our Solar System, plus  β Pic b. Mercury and Venus do not fit thsi relation as they have been spun down due to tidal interaction with the Sun.   (Credit: Snellen et al. 2014, Nature, 509, 63)

Rotation rate versus mass for the planets in our Solar System, plus β Pic b. Mercury and Venus do not fit this relation as they have been spun down due to tidal interaction with the Sun. (Credit: Snellen et al. 2014, Nature, 509, 63)

As number of exoplants that are directly detected increases, this technique will help astronomer investigate the spin-mass relation on other planets, as well as study the weather systems on exoplanets.  The rapid rotation rates of the giant planets in our Solar System dominate their weather systems, which is most likely true on β Pic b as well.

For more information, see

[Sarah Maddison]

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Arecibo detects Fast Radio Burst

The 305-m Arecibo Radio Telescope in Puerto Rico has detected a Fast Radio Burst (FRB), proving that these mysterious bursts of radiation are indeed real!  FRBs are very intense, short-lived (generally a few milliseconds) single event bursts of radio radiation. They appear to originate at extragalactic distances but are of unknown origin. The first FRB was discovered in 2007 by Duncan Lorimer and collaborators, after analysing archival data from the 64-m Parkes radio telescope. This extremely intense burst of radio was subsequently dubbed the ‘Lorimer Burst’. In 2012 another FRB candidate was detected in Parkes archival data, but this time potentially from within our own Galaxy. Then in 2013, four more FRBs were found, again from Parkes data and again  at apparently extragalactic distances. Their origin remains a mystery, and the fact that all 6 known FRBs were detected with Parkes has cast some doubt about their astrophysical origin.

The 305-m Arecibo radio telescope in Puerto Rico. (Credit: NAIC)

The Arecibo FRB is the first detected independently of Parkes, confirming that these strong radio tranients are not due to terrestrial sources local to Parkes (in New South Wales, Australia) or instrumental errors in the Parkes telescope. The Arecibo FRB, known as FRB 121102, was detected 2 November 2012, with the radio burst lasting just 3 milliseconds. It has properties very similar to the other 6 FRBs, which means that there is something happening out there in the universe producing these strong radio bursts, though astronomers are still unsure about their origin or even their distance from us.

How do astronomers determine distances to radio sources?  This can be estimated from the dispersion measure (DM), which is a “smearing” of the pulse of radio radiation as it travels through space.  Like all forms of electromagnetic radiation, radio waves travel at the speed of light through a vacuum. However, space is not a true vacuum. The interstellar medium of our Galaxy, for example, is filled with gas and dust and charged particles. As radio photons travel through space, electrostatic interaction between the photons and the charged particles – especially electrons – cause delays in the propagation of the light.  More energetic (higher frequency) photons tend to push past the free electrons with little effect on their propagation speed, while lower energy (lower frequency) photons are more significantly delayed.  The amount of smearing of the radio signal (or the amount of delay between the arrival time of the lower frequency compared with the higher frequency radio photons) provides an estimate of how far away the signal originated, as well as the amount of material between the source as the Earth.

While the signal from FRB 121102 came from the direction of the plane of our Galaxy, it appears to have originated at an extragalactic distant.  Its dispersion measure is about three times greater that DM expected from our Galaxy, indicated it came from outside our Galaxy.

Discovery plots of the Fast Radio Burst FRB 121102 made with the Arecibo telescope. The top panel shows the dispersion measure, the bottom left shows that strong signal lasting only a few milliseconds, and the bottom right panel shows the pulse versus non-pulse. (Credit: Spitler et al. 2014)

Discovery plots of the Fast Radio Burst FRB 121102 made with the Arecibo telescope. The top panel shows the dispersion measure profile; the bottom left shows that strong signal lasting only a few milliseconds; and the bottom right panel shows the pulse versus non-pulse. (Credit: Spitler et al. 2014)

The nature of the origin of this burst – and the other FRBs – remains a mystery. Theories include coalescing neutron stars, the collapse of supermassive stars, or even evaporating black holes.  To learn more about the origin of FRBs and to study them in detail, astronomers need huge telescopes that can survey large areas of the sky in a short period of time. This is just what the Square Kilometre Array and the Molonglo telescope will do. Until then, astronomers will do doubt come up with a wide range of theories to explain the origins of FRBs!

For more information, see

[Sarah Maddison & Themiya Nanayakkara]

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

New particle confirmed: the tetraquark

When physicists at CERN’s Large Hadron Collider, one of the most ambitious experimental machines ever built, provided affirmation of the famously termed ‘God Particle’ and along with it the greatest scientific discovery of the decade, one may have expected that they would rest easy for a while. They did not.

Using the LHCb experiment (which complements the ATLAS detector of Higgs Boson fame) at the world’s largest particle accelerator, an entirely new form of matter known as the tetraquark has been confirmed. Enigmatically named ‘Z(4330)’, the particle is four times as massive as a proton and has a negative electromagnetic charge.

Particle physics is the study of subatomic particles and the forces that they exert on each other.  We know that atoms are made of negatively charged electrons orbiting a tiny, heavy nucleus, which contains positively charged protons and neutrons (particles with no charge). But which particles are truly fundamental? Which particles are the smallest building blocks in nature? It turns out that many particles, including protons and neutrons, are made of combinations of quarks.

Protons and neutrons are hadrons, each comprising three quarks.  All hardrons are held together by the strong nuclear force. Protons comprise up-up-down quarks, while neutrons comprise up-down-down. (Credit: Swinburne Astronomy Online)

Protons and neutrons are hadrons, each comprising three quarks. Protons comprise up-up-down quarks, while neutrons comprise up-down-down.  All hadrons are held together by the strong nuclear force. (Credit: Swinburne Astronomy Online)

Quarks are subatomic particles that are unique in having fractional electromagnetic charges of 1/3 or 2/3 (compared to electrons and protons, which have an integer charge of  -1 and +1 respectively), as well as exhibiting another characteristic that physicists call colour-charge. While there are just two types of electromagnetic charge – positive and negative  the property of colour-charge is slightly more complex. There are the red, green and blue colours, as well as their opposites: anti-red, anti-green and anti-blue. (Almost all particles have a corresponding “anti-particle”.)

The labelling of a quark’s colour has nothing to do with our eye’s perception of visible light. Instead it describes the tendency of quarks to combine in neutral states. Just as visible light’s colours mix to produce white light, red, green and blue quarks will form a colour-neutral particle (just as the combination of a positively and negatively charged particle will result in a charge-neutral particle). When quarks combine, the resulting particle will be colour-neutral.

Quarks  - which are never found in isolation – are held together by the strong nuclear force, governed by the what is called the “theory of quantum chromodynamics” (or QCD) that fits into the Standard Model of particle physics. The Standard Model attempts to describe the fundamental particles and how they interact, and is able to explain nearly all of the interactions we know about: electromagnetic, weak and strong nuclear forces… but not gravity. Within the Standard Model, bound quarks form the family of particles known as hadrons, which all feel the strong nuclear force.

Until a week ago hadrons were known to come in two distinct varieties: baryons, which  are made of three quarks and include protons and neutrons, and mesons, which are made of two quarks (a quark-antiquark pair). There is a new form of hadron: tetraquarks, which contain four quarks.

Tetraquarks comprise two colour-anticolour pairs, thus obeying the ‘colour neutrality’ of quantum chromodynamics. The vast majority of its mass comes from the energy required to hold these quarks together via the strong force.  The interesting thing about the tetraquark is that it provides an insight into the mechanism that binds quarks together. By smashing particles together and observing vast numbers of particles as they flash in and out of existence inside the LHCb, particle physicists can replicate conditions similar to that of the energetic early Universe. In the very early Universe, just after the Big Bang, there was a period known as the “quark epoch”, when particle collisions were too energetic to allows quarks to combine to form baryons or mesons. Understanding how quarks bind may help us understand the quark epoch of the early Universe.

The existence of the long theorised tetraquark may also change our perception and description of neutron stars, which are the remnants of massive stars left over after a supernova explosion. The basic model of a neutron star assumes that is comprised almost entirely of neutrons. Because of this, the density of their interior is immense, with a teaspoon of neutron star material weighing around a billion tonnes, and harbouring some of the strongest gravitational fields in the Universe. The existence of a tetraquark is proof that nature is able to form matter with more complex quark configurations than have previously been found. The colossal energy of particle interactions inside the neutron star may allow tetraquarks and even higher quark configurations, such as the hypothesised pentaquark (five quarks) and hexaquark (six quarks), to be produced. This means astrophysicists must revisit the model of a neutron star and the assumptions that dictate its internal structure.  If it is possible for these complex quark states to exist, then this opens up the possibility of quarks interacting individually, creating a free quark plasma and giving tantalising hints to the existence of the long sought after quark star.

Neutron stars, comprising neutrons, compared with a (theorised) quark star, comprising free quarks. (Credit: Univirse Today)

For more information, see

[Toby Brown & Sarah Maddison]

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Binary asteroids

Planetary scientists Seth Jacobson and Daniel Scheeres, both from University of Colorado, have developed a theory that explains the formation of synchronous binary asteroids, as well as all other dynamical classes of Near Earth Asteroids (NEAs). Their model follows the dynamical evolution of rotationally fissioned asteroids – asteroids whose rotation has increased to break-up speed.

Contrary to what you might think, astronomers believe that most asteroids are not solid monoliths of rock orbiting the Sun, but are better described as “rubble piles” – a collection of smaller boulders bound together by their mutual gravitational force. It is thought that low-speed collisions amongst asteroids can fracture them, but as long as the relative velocity amongst the shattered fragments of an asteroid is less than their mutual escape velocity, the fragments can remain gravitationally bound as a rubble pile.

Evidence that asteroids may indeed be rubble piles include their relatively low rotation rates (which needs to be low so as not to fling the small fragments away from each other), low bulk density (regardless of their surface composition, a rubble pile would have high porosity and hence low bulk density), and the fact that binary asteroids – or asteroids with satellites – are relatively common.  The first asteroid satellite, the Ita-Dactyl system, was discovered in 1993 by the Galileo spacecraft on its way to Jupiter. Since then many more have been discovered, and about 2% of Main Belt asteroids and 15% of NEAs are binaries.

Animation of the orbit of the binary Near-Earth Asteroid (66391) 1999 KW4 (Credit: NASA/JPL)

When sunlight hits the day-side of an asteroid, some of the light will be scattered while some will be absorbed and then re-emitted as heat or thermal radiation. For a rotating, irregularly shaped asteroid, this results in asymmetric re-emission of thermal radiation. This causes a small torque that changes the rotation rate and orientation of the spin axis of the asteroid.  This is known as the YORP (or Yarkovsky–O’Keefe–Radzievskii–Paddack) effect, and while the torque is very small, over long periods of time the asteroid’s spin rate can increase.  The smaller the asteroid, the larger the effect and small asteroids (generally less than 10 km) can be rotationally fissioned by the YORP effect, effectively turning one asteroid into two asteroids.

If the original asteroid was a rubble pile, then Jacobson and Scheeres argue that both asteroids in the binary must be rubble piles. They suggest that the smaller of the pair can undergo a ‘secondary fission’ – not due to the YORP effect this time, but due to a coupling of the spin and orbital states for the binary system.  The smaller secondary asteroid can “steal” rotational energy from the larger primary asteroid, increasing its rotation rate (while decreasing the rotation of the larger asteroid and changing the shape of their mutual orbit). The smaller asteroid can rotationally fission, producing a chaotic ternary (3-body) system. Energy can swap between the spins and orbits of these three bodies, as well as be damped by tidal effects, which can result in a wide range of outcomes. Impacts between members of the ternary or the escape of one member will help stabilise the resulting binary system.

They conclude that rotational fission can explain all NEA systems, including synchronous binaries (where the spin rate of the secondary equals the rotation rate of the binary pair), high eccentricity binaries (which are asynchronous and have highly oval orbits), ternary systems (3-body systems thought to form after a binary asteroid  undergoes a secondary rotational fission), and contact binaries (which results when gravity pulls the two asteroids together until they touch, forming a single irregularly shaped asteroid).

“NEAs are actively evolving systems driven by these processes and the observed asteroid classes are stages in this evolution”, the authors conclude. This work sheds light on the  mechanism that contributes to the formation and potential disintegration of small asteroids.

For more information, see

[Sheridan Lacey & Sarah Maddison]

** Note: the 2014 arXiv paper by Jacobson & Scheeres (arxiv:1404.0801) was in fact published in Icarus in 2011 (Icarus, 2011, 214, 161) !

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment